Skip to content

Theater of the Techno-Oppressed

Theater of the Techno-Oppressed is an outreach activity aimed at bringing universities closer to their community in the joint fight against technology-amplified oppression. Despite all the hype and hope around it, the technologies developed by universities and other research institutions are not inherently good. Many of those have already been instrumentalized to globalize fascism, xenophobia, sexism, and racism.

Philosophers, scientists, engineers, activists, legislators, and designers working to dismantle these systems are now researching how technology does that and, especially, how it does that under the pretext of neutrality. They need to know how to appropriate, redesign, and turn the biases of such technologies for their progressive ends.

The goal: to encourage critical users

This outreach activity thus aims to raise critical consciousness about the role of technology in our everyday lives, particularly how it constrains our bodies into specific physical and/or political postures that accept oppression as an inevitable reality. For example, dating apps, ride-hailing apps, work platforms, video streaming, and social networks depend on users lingering at specific postures several times a day to meet their not-so-clear ends. The anti-social habits shaped by these apps have caused severe damage to worker rights, mental health, and democracy.

Theater of the Techno-Oppressed is mainly targeted at users, not technology designers. Designers can participate, but they must also enter the stage as users to understand the user perspective before imagining alter/native technologies. Only at this positionality, people can understand what it is like to be oppressed as a user or, in other words, to be a victim of userism. This activity helps people realize that society needs to encourage critical users fighting for user rights, just as it has organized to fight for consumer rights since the 1970s. Different from consumer rights, user rights include design as a general human right.

Why theater?

Scholars across many fields have produced critical discourses on technology, including Science and Technology Studies (STS), Philosophy of Technology, Critical Data Studies, Algorithm Studies, Feminist Technoscience, and more. These discourses, as relevant as they are to social movements, are largely communicated through academic texts and other channels with limited reach into everyday life. Theater of the Techno-Oppressed addresses that limitation by bringing body language to this dialogue. It draws primarily on Theater of the Oppressed, a method developed by Brazilian dramaturg Augusto Boal in the 1970s that has been tested in many worlds beyond Latin America. By enacting self and other bodies in action, Theater of the Techno-Oppressed fosters critical body consciousness and the collective will to design alter/native technologies for the liberation of the oppressed people.

Besides analyzing existing technologies, Theater of the Techno-Oppressed can conceptualize new technologies directly from the Embodied Interaction Design practices it incorporates, such as bodystorming. In contrast with bodystorming, though, Theater of the Oppressed invites political (and politicized) design bodies to enter the stage, bringing to the fore racial, gender, class, and other body-based differences.

Impersonating the technology on stage

Impersonating technology is crucial to realizing its functionalities, biases, and infrastructure. The actor impersonator acts toward the other actors like a scripted robot, a virtual assistant, or a physical machine. They, in turn, interact with the technology through the metaphorical body interface: they get information from the technology (inter)face, pull their arms as if they were levers, press their chests as if they were buttons, and talk to the technology as if it accepted voice commands. The oppressive nature of the interaction typically becomes more apparent when the actor playing the designer steps onto the stage and reveals their intentions for redesigning their initiative to oppressive reactions.

Impersonating technology is a way to deconstruct from the inside out both the discourse of neutrality and technological determinism that depoliticize technology development. The spect-actor discovers its intentionality, origin, privileges, configurations, and functionalities by thinking and acting as a technology. On the other hand, they also discover how these constitutive aspects can be transformed through the critical appropriation of technology for different ends. 

Workshop format

Theater of the Techno-Oppressed is an ongoing outreach activity, meaning that it spreads chronologically through many places and moments. Institutions that would like to join this outreach activity can host short-term workshops and long-term laboratories to train people in method multiplication.

Universities, schools, platform cooperatives, solidarity-economy enterprises, community associations, and art collectives are among the organizations that may be interested in hosting a workshop. For Universities, in particular, this workshop is a valuable educational tool that helps future designers learn to position themselves critically in a world where transnational and pluriversal technologies cross many worlds. The workshop can also be of interest to design activists, researchers, and practitioners concerned with the role of technology in mediating relations of oppression. These are usually people who have first-hand experience of oppression: users, women, Black and People of Color, indigenous, LGBTQIA+, people from the Global South, disabled, and generally non-White people. People who do not see themselves as oppressed can still join as allies of the oppressed.

The workshop is structured as follows:

  1. A very short introduction to Theater of the Oppressed and Embodied Interaction Design
    • Workshop complicators’ introduction
    • Why having a dialogue with the whole body (including body language) is so crucial for dealing with body-based oppression and designing alter/native embodied technology
    • The tree of Theater of the Oppressed (overview of its major techniques)
  2. Warming up and demechanizing the body by playing dramatic games
    • Participants’ introduction through “ice-breaking” games
    • Activating touch
    • Activating listening
    • Activating all senses
    • Activating collective body sensing
    • Forming groups by shared experiences of oppression
  3. The theater technique (Image Theater, Newspaper Theater, Object Theater, Legislative Theater, or Interaction Design Theater, depending on the audience experience, historical context, and workshop duration)
    • Sharing a personal story of oppression into small groups
    • Choosing one story to tell to the larger group
    • Rehearsing an improvised quick play that conveys the story in an ambivalent way
    • Presenting and interacting with the audience
    • Explore the design space of alter/native technologies
  4. Debriefing dialogue
    • What have you learned today?
    • What are the challenges of tackling technology-mediated oppression?
    • What can we do against oppression beyond this workshop?

Body requirements

This activity is open to all human bodies, including those who think they have no talent to act. Special accommodations can be provided for people with disabilities, people with limited movements, racialized people living with racial trauma, survivors of sexual assault, and other people who would like to disclose special needs to the complicator prior to or during the workshop. The suggested clothing is casual and flexible.

The theater technique relies on improvisation and everyday body language and does not require professional training or an extroverted personality. There are no written scripts or memorized lines, as it relies mainly on silent acting. Because of that simple setup, people who usually do not feel confident acting on stage can feel confident acting against oppression as part of a collective work.

At every step in the activity, participants can choose to be on stage or in the audience. What they cannot do, from an ethical standpoint, is remain neutral in the face of oppression. Extending the Brechtian tradition of theater and Freirean education style, in Theater of the Oppressed, the audience is constantly invited by the complicator to discuss and decode what is happening on stage. Staying in the audience is a relevant and valuable contribution for those who don’t feel comfortable acting with the whole body.

The workshop proponent acts as a complicator, the opposite of a facilitator. This role provides examples of using theater techniques to discuss technology-mediation issues, and the participants copy and develop them further. What is most difficult in Theater of the Techno-Oppressed is not the challenge of acting but the challenge of thinking through the oppressive aspects of technology that go largely unnoticed, and that produce privilege and silent complicity. The complicator’s primary goal is to keep the group focused on problematizing this troubled reality.

Space requirements

Theater of the Techno-Oppressed is very flexible and can be adapted to fit any space, including traditional classrooms. The ideal space is not a theater hall, but an acting studio.

The ideal features are:

  • Wide enough for collective body movement
  • Soundproof enough for singing in choir
  • Having movable or stackable chairs for the audience
  • Soft, warm, and firm floors that people can lie on
  • Close access to drinking water and bathrooms

List of institutions that have hosted workshops

  • PUCPR (2017)
  • UTFPR (2019)
  • IHC conference (2019)
  • ESDI (2022)
  • UFBA (2022)
  • ServDes conference (2023)

Post-pandemic remote version

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the outreach activity that often led participants to realize they were relying too much on digital technology had to rely on digital technology itself. We integrated Jitsi, SnapCamera, StreamYard, and Youtube in an artful way to host remote theater forums using augmented reality masks. Later on, we developed remote image theater using 3D body modeling applications. Whenever health and economic conditions allow, face-to-face is preferred over remote.

Related published work

Van Amstel, Frederick M. C. , and Fernando Secomandi. (2025) Collective Embodiment in Service Interfaces. In Penin, L. de S., Prendiville, A. and Sangiorgi, D. (Eds), Bloomsbury Handbook of Service Design: Plural perspectives and a critical contemporary agenda, 305–316. London New York: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2025. https://fredvanamstel.com/publications/collective-embodiment-in-service-interfaces

Secomandi, F., & Van Amstel, F. M. C. (2025). Coerced Recognition at the Service Interface: A Design Ethics Framework for Unveiling the User Oppression. Journal of Human-Technology Relations, 3, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.59490/jhtr.2025.3.7745

Van Amstel, Frederick M. C., Serpa, Bibibiana, Secomandi, Fernando. (2025). Systemic oppression in service design. In: Suoheimo, M., Jones, P., Lee, S., Sevaldson, B (Eds). Systemic service design. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003501039-7

Bizotto dos Santos, W.B., Mazzarotto, M.,and Van Amstel, F. (2023). Learning design as a human right: the beginnings of a design lab founded on critical pedagogy, in Derek Jones, Naz Borekci, Violeta Clemente, James Corazzo, Nicole Lotz, Liv Merete Nielsen, Lesley-Ann Noel (eds.), The 7th International Conference for Design Education Researchers, 29 November – 1 December 2023, London, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.21606/drslxd.2023.104

Saito, Carmem; Van Amstel, Frederick M. C.; Serpa, Bibiana O; Angelon, Rafaela. Wicked rituals of contemporary design thinking. (2023). In: Mehl, Johanna and Höfler, Carolin (Eds). Attending [to] Futures. Matters of Politics in Design Education, Research, Practice. Hamburg: Adocs. p. 150-161. http://doi.org/10.53198/9783943253726

Gonzatto, R.F. and Van Amstel, F.M.C. (2022), “User oppression in human-computer interaction: a dialectical-existential perspective”, Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 74 No. 5, pp. 758-781. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2021-0233

Saito, C., Serpa, B.O., Angelon, R., and van Amstel, F. (2022) Coming to terms with design wickedness: Reflections from a forum theatre on design thinking, in Lockton, D., Lenzi, S., Hekkert, P., Oak, A., Sádaba, J., Lloyd, P. (eds.), DRS2022: Bilbao, 25 June – 3 July, Bilbao, Spain. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.668

Gonzatto, R. F., & van Amstel, F. M. (2017, October). Designing oppressive and libertarian interactions with the conscious body. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 10 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3160504.3160542

Categories: Methods & Tools, Outreach.

Tags: , , , , , , ,